Full-size SUVs have become a popular choice for families and individuals seeking a combination of space, capability, and comfort. In 2017, several models stood out in the market, offering a blend of performance, technology, and practicality. This overview will highlight key features of the top-rated full-size SUVs from that year, providing auto owners with essential insights to make informed decisions.
Key Features of 2017 Full-Size SUVs
Performance and Powertrains
When it comes to performance, 2017 full-size SUVs offered a range of powerful engine options. Most models came equipped with V6 or V8 engines, providing ample horsepower for towing and off-road capabilities. Here are some notable powertrains:
- Ford Expedition: A robust 3.5L EcoBoost V6 engine delivering 365 horsepower.
- Chevrolet Tahoe: A 5.3L V8 engine with 355 horsepower, known for its reliability.
- GMC Yukon: Similar to the Tahoe, it features a 5.3L V8, with an optional 6.2L V8 for more power.
- Dodge Durango: Offers a choice between a 3.6L V6 and a 5.7L HEMI V8, catering to different performance needs.
Interior Comfort and Technology
The interior of a full-size SUV is crucial for family trips and daily commutes. In 2017, manufacturers focused on providing spacious and comfortable cabins, loaded with advanced technology. Key interior features included:
- Seating Capacity: Most models comfortably seat 7 to 8 passengers, with flexible seating arrangements.
- Infotainment Systems: Many SUVs came with user-friendly systems, such as Chevrolet’s MyLink and Ford’s SYNC, featuring smartphone integration.
- Cargo Space: Generous cargo capacity, often exceeding 90 cubic feet with rear seats folded down, making them ideal for hauling gear.
Fuel Efficiency
While full-size SUVs are not typically known for their fuel efficiency, advancements in engine technology in 2017 helped improve mileage. Here are some average fuel economy ratings for popular models:
| Model | City MPG | Highway MPG |
|---|---|---|
| Ford Expedition | 15 | 22 |
| Chevrolet Tahoe | 16 | 23 |
| GMC Yukon | 16 | 23 |
| Dodge Durango | 18 | 25 |
Safety Features
Safety is a top priority for many SUV buyers. In 2017, several full-size SUVs were equipped with advanced safety features, although it’s essential to check individual ratings. Some common safety technologies included:
- Forward Collision Warning: Alerts drivers to potential collisions.
- Blind Spot Monitoring: Helps detect vehicles in blind spots.
- Adaptive Cruise Control: Maintains a safe distance from the vehicle ahead.
Market Position and Popularity
The 2017 full-size SUV market was competitive, with several models vying for consumer attention. The Chevrolet Tahoe and Ford Expedition were particularly popular, known for their reliability and strong resale values. The GMC Yukon also maintained a loyal following due to its upscale features and performance.
Overall, the 2017 full-size SUVs offered a compelling mix of power, comfort, and technology, making them suitable for a variety of lifestyles and needs. Whether you’re hauling a family, towing a trailer, or simply enjoying a road trip, these vehicles provided the versatility and capability that many auto owners sought.
In-Depth Look at Full-Size SUVs from 2017
Full-size SUVs have carved a niche for themselves in the automotive market, appealing to families and adventure seekers alike. The 2017 models brought a mix of power, technology, and comfort, but how do they stack up against each other? This detailed exploration will provide ratings, statistics, key parameters, pros and cons, and comparisons with alternatives and previous models.
2017 Full-Size SUV Ratings
The ratings for full-size SUVs in 2017 were influenced by various factors, including performance, comfort, safety, and technology. Below is a table summarizing the ratings of some of the top models based on reviews from authoritative sources such as U.S. News & World Report, Edmunds, and Consumer Reports.
| Model | Overall Rating | Performance | Interior Quality | Safety Rating | Fuel Economy (MPG) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Expedition | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 4/5 | 15/22 |
| Chevrolet Tahoe | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 | 4/5 | 16/23 |
| GMC Yukon | 8.4/10 | 8.5/10 | 9.0/10 | 4/5 | 16/23 |
| Dodge Durango | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 | 4/5 | 18/25 |
Key Parameters
Understanding the key parameters that define these SUVs is crucial for potential buyers. Here are some important aspects to consider:
- Engine Options: Most full-size SUVs in 2017 offered a choice between V6 and V8 engines, allowing buyers to select based on their performance needs.
- Towing Capacity: These vehicles are built for heavy-duty tasks, with towing capacities often exceeding 8,000 pounds, making them ideal for trailers and boats.
- Interior Space: With three rows of seating, these SUVs typically accommodate 7 to 8 passengers comfortably, with ample cargo space.
- Technology Features: Many models were equipped with advanced infotainment systems, Bluetooth connectivity, and available navigation systems.
Pros and Cons
Each model has its strengths and weaknesses. Here’s a breakdown of the pros and cons for the top-rated full-size SUVs of 2017:
Ford Expedition
- Pros:
- Spacious and comfortable interior.
- Strong towing capacity.
- Advanced safety features.
- Cons:
- Less fuel-efficient compared to competitors.
- Higher price point for fully loaded models.
Chevrolet Tahoe
- Pros:
- Strong V8 performance.
- Excellent resale value.
- Well-equipped with technology features.
- Cons:
- Less agile handling compared to smaller SUVs.
- Higher fuel consumption.
GMC Yukon
- Pros:
- Luxurious interior with high-quality materials.
- Strong performance and towing capabilities.
- Advanced safety features available.
- Cons:
- Price can escalate quickly with options.
- Fuel economy is not competitive.
Dodge Durango
- Pros:
- Sporty handling and performance.
- Good fuel economy for the class.
- Available V8 engine for enhanced power.
- Cons:
- Less cargo space compared to competitors.
- Interior quality is not as upscale.
Comparative Analysis with Alternatives
When comparing the 2017 full-size SUVs to alternatives or previous models, several factors come into play. For instance, the 2016 models had similar ratings but lacked some of the advanced safety and technology features found in the 2017 lineup.
Comparison with Previous Models
| Model | 2016 Overall Rating | 2017 Overall Rating | Notable Improvements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Expedition | 8.3/10 | 8.5/10 | Enhanced safety features and infotainment. |
| Chevrolet Tahoe | 8.1/10 | 8.2/10 | Improved technology options. |
| GMC Yukon | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 | More luxurious interior finishes. |
| Dodge Durango | 7.9/10 | 8.0/10 | Better fuel efficiency and handling. |
In summary, the 2017 full-size SUV market offered a range of options, each with its unique strengths and weaknesses. Buyers had the opportunity to choose a model that best suited their needs, whether it was for family travel, towing, or off-road adventures.
Practical Advice for Buyers and Owners of Full-Size SUVs
Purchasing a full-size SUV is a significant investment, and potential buyers should be well-informed to make the best decision. Here are some practical tips, potential risks, and alternative options to consider.
Key Factors to Consider
When evaluating a full-size SUV, keep the following factors in mind:
Performance Needs
- Assess your driving habits. Do you need a powerful engine for towing or off-road capabilities?
- Consider the type of terrain you will be driving on regularly.
Fuel Economy
- Full-size SUVs are not known for their fuel efficiency. Check the MPG ratings and consider how that will affect your budget.
- Look for models with hybrid options if fuel economy is a priority.
Interior Space and Comfort
- Evaluate how many passengers you typically transport. Ensure the SUV can comfortably seat everyone.
- Check cargo space for your needs, especially if you plan on using the vehicle for family trips or hauling gear.
Potential Risks
While full-size SUVs offer many benefits, there are also potential risks to be aware of:
Maintenance Costs
- Full-size SUVs can have higher maintenance and repair costs compared to smaller vehicles.
- Be prepared for potential expenses related to tires, brakes, and engine repairs, especially as the vehicle ages.
Depreciation
- Full-size SUVs tend to depreciate faster than sedans or smaller vehicles.
- Research resale values and consider how long you plan to keep the vehicle.
Safety Ratings
- While many full-size SUVs come equipped with advanced safety features, not all models perform equally in crash tests.
- Check ratings from reputable sources like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
Better Alternatives
If you are uncertain about committing to a full-size SUV, consider these alternatives:
Midsize SUVs
- Models like the Toyota Highlander and Honda Pilot offer ample space and features while being more fuel-efficient.
- They are easier to maneuver and park, making them suitable for urban environments.
Crossovers
- Crossovers like the Subaru Outback or Ford Edge provide a car-like driving experience with good cargo space.
- They often come with better fuel economy and lower maintenance costs.
Pickup Trucks
- If towing capacity is your primary concern, consider a full-size pickup truck like the Ford F-150 or Chevrolet Silverado.
- These vehicles often offer better towing capabilities and can be more versatile for work and play.
Comparison Table of Alternatives
Here’s a comparison table of some alternatives to full-size SUVs, highlighting key features:
| Model | Seating Capacity | Fuel Economy (MPG) | Towing Capacity (lbs) | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Highlander | 7-8 | 20/27 | 5,000 | $34,600 |
| Honda Pilot | 7-8 | 20/27 | 5,000 | $32,500 |
| Subaru Outback | 5 | 26/33 | 2,700 | $26,795 |
| Ford F-150 | 3-6 | 20/26 | 13,200 | $28,940 |
By considering these factors, potential risks, and alternatives, buyers can make a more informed decision when selecting a full-size SUV or exploring other vehicle options.
Explore the 2017 full size SUV ratings, key factors to consider, potential risks, and better alternatives for informed buying decisions.